Source: apertium-spa-cat Version: 2.2.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking for gawk... (cached) gawk > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for apertium >= 3.6.0... yes > checking for apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2... no > configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not > met > > No package 'apertium-lex-tools' found > > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard prefix. > > Alternatively, you may set the environment variables APERTIUM_LEX_TOOLS_CFLAGS > and APERTIUM_LEX_TOOLS_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. > See the pkg-config man page for more details. > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:17: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/24/apertium-spa-cat_2.2.0-2_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220624;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220624&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
