Bug#1006374: graphicsmagick breaks ruby-mini-magick autopkgtest: Failure/Error: expect(subject["EXIF:Flash"]).to eq "0"

[Paul Gevers]

Source: graphicsmagick, ruby-mini-magick
Control: found -1 graphicsmagick/1.4+really1.3.37+hg16662-1
Control: found -1 ruby-mini-magick/4.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),



                       pass            fail
graphicsmagick         from testing    1.4+really1.3.37+hg16662-1
ruby-mini-magick       from testing    4.11.0-1
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.



More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=graphicsmagick

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/ruby-mini-magick/19529839/log.gz


Failures:

  1) With GraphicsMagick MiniMagick::Image#[] reads exif
     Failure/Error: expect(subject["EXIF:Flash"]).to eq "0"

       expected: "0"
            got: ""

       (compared using ==)


  2) With GraphicsMagick MiniMagick::Image#exif returns a hash of EXIF data

       expected nil to be a kind of String


  3) With GraphicsMagick MiniMagick::Image#exif decodes the ExifVersion
     Failure/Error: expect(subject.exif["ExifVersion"]).to eq("0220")

       expected: "0220"
            got: nil

       (compared using ==)


Finished in 7.05 seconds (files took 0.41511 seconds to load)
284 examples, 3 failures, 5 pending

Failed examples:




mv ./.gem2deb.lib lib
autopkgtest [10:17:01]: test gem2deb-test-runner

With a recent upload of graphicsmagick the autopkgtest of ruby-mini-magick fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of graphicsmagick from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form: Currently this regression is blocking the migration of graphicsmagick to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package? # ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb:365:in `block (5 levels) in <top (required)>' Failure/Error: expect(subject.exif["DateTimeOriginal"]).to be_a(String) # ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb:404:in `block (5 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb:409:in `block (5 levels) in <top (required)>' rspec ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb[2:1:11:3] # With GraphicsMagick MiniMagick::Image#[] reads exif rspec ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb[2:1:16:1] # With GraphicsMagick MiniMagick::Image#exif returns a hash of EXIF data rspec ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb[2:1:16:2] # With GraphicsMagick MiniMagick::Image#exif decodes the ExifVersion /usr/bin/ruby2.7 -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.10.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/lib /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/exe/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature