On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:32:28 -0500 Andres Salomon <dilin...@queued.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:15:01 +0100 > Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and > > > then deal with buster/bullseye? > > > > Yeah, let's proceed with unstable first in any case. > > > > > Upload everything all at once? I'm also > > > going to try building for buster, unless the security team doesn't > > > think I should bother. > > > > I saw > > https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/commit/5c05f430e192961527ec9a64bbaa64401dc14d95 > > , but buster now also includes LLVM/clang 11 (it was introduced to > > support a more recent Rust toolchain needed for Firefox), so you > > might be reduce complexity here further: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/llvm-toolchain-11 > > > > It's in buster-proposed-updates since there hasn't been a point > > release since, but for the purposes of buster-security builds, it > > doesn't matter (they chroots have been modified to includen > > buster-proposed-updates temporarily): > > Ah, very helpful, thanks! I'll give buster a try (just created > the 'v96-buster' branch). Between that and various backports, I think > we might be in good shape. Unfortunately it needs a newer nodejs than what's in buster, so I'll go back to focusing on bullseye & sid for now. :(
