On Sun, 05 Dec 2021 12:50:32 +0100 intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> wrote:
Here's a merge request that updates Fava to 1.20.1:https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/fava/-/merge_requests/1 I did not dare uploading because I resorted to a rather ugly hack for the tests to pass: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/fava/-/blob/debian/new-upstream-1.20.1/debian/patches/0002-Ensure-fava.__version__-is-defined-even-when-the-dis.patch I suppose there's a better way to do it but I know very little about Python packaging, so I would appreciate if someone more at ease in this area reviewed this. Might this be related to the other patch, which is also about version numbers? Suggestions welcome :)
Hi intrigeri,thanks a lot for your work! I've added some more tweaks and uploaded the new version to unstable.
Regarding your patch, the tests pass and there does not seem to be a regression to the last version (1.18-1).
As a side note: in your local repository, there's probably a tag for upstream/1.20.1, which is missing on salsa. Could you please push that to salsa as well? Thanks!
Regards, Tobias
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
