Source: ruby-sorted-set Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: serious User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Tags: help
After doing some debugging on the ruby-hamster FTBFS, the problem seems to be ruby-btree and ruby-sorted-set breaking the tests. In a pure Ruby 2.7 environment, this is true: SortedSet.new([1,3,2]).eql?(SortedSet.new([1,2,3])) => true Installing ruby-rbtree, and the same matcher becomes false: SortedSet.new([1,3,2]).eql?(SortedSet.new([1,2,3])) => false Now adding ruby-sorted-set in the mix for the Ruby3.0 transition, which depends on ruby-rbtree, more tests fail. This is causing ruby-hamster's tests to fail. This bug report is to indicate that this blocks the ruby-hamster fix. Regards, Daniel -- Regards, Daniel Leidert <dleid...@debian.org> | https://www.wgdd.de/ GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78 https://www.fiverr.com/dleidert https://www.patreon.com/join/dleidert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
