Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:26:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line irrelevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gerstensaft
Version: 0.2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either orphaned or removed completly from Debian
(unstable and testing) since they have been obviously neglected by their
maintainer.
Your package did show up on this list and we propose to remove it. There
are only very few users, your last maintainer upload was in 2001 and it
has a FTBFS bug at the moment (which you, as it seems, don't have the
time to fix).
This usually means that your package matched some of the following
criteria:
[1] Your packages has not had an upload for more than two years
[2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
[3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
might be MIA
[4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than
100 users with the package installed.
[5] the package was not released with sarge
and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.
(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed
more than one month before the time the check was performed.
After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).
The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to
proceed.
Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
Marc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I believe that this bug report is not relevant anymore.
Regards,
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea.
--- End Message ---
