Control: found -1 78.11.0esr-1 Hi Hideki and Jochen,
Thank you for both of your responses. On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 08:08:44AM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Hideki Yamane <henr...@iijmio-mail.jp> [2021-06-28 22:35]: > > Can you reproduce it on freshly installed bullseye sytem? After apt upgrade (firefox now at 78.11.0esr-1), the issue is still there. The offending instruction is the same and the backtrace looks very similar. Given that the cause seems well understood (use of NEON instructions on a non-NEON system), I don't think a fresh install would give us any new information. > I only found this reference for NEON on armhf: > > "NEON and VFP/VFP2/VFP3 remain an optional part of the architecture." > > https://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatPort#VFP In addition: "VFPv3-D16 is the common denominator of the processors to support here (therefore the recommended build option is -mfpu=vfpv3-d16)" https://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatPort/VfpComparison#FPU I couldn't find a more authoritative definition of the supported architecture subset for the armhf port. > If this is still reproducible, I see two options: > - Disable NEON code. > - Depend on the neon-support dummy package. Agreed. > > > Kernel: Linux 3.5.7-14-ARCH (PREEMPT) > > It seems that is not the kernel bullseye provides. Correct. The default Debian armhf kernel doesn't give me video, and I forgot whether it even boots. > > And it maybe help to provide its hardware information, too. > The bug author wrote: > > > > This is on a Marvell Dove system, with VFPv3-D16. From /proc/cpuinfo: > > > Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp iwmmxt thumbee vfpv3 > > > vfpv3d16 tls More specifically, this is on a SolidRun CuBox (first generation, so not the CuBox-i or CuBox-M). I noticed that some time ago, the severity of this bug was raised from normal to serious. While it is serious on my system, I had set it to normal because it likely affects only a relatively small number of systems. And while I would appreciate this bug getting resolved, making it release critical seems unnecessary. Regards, Vincent.
