Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The second thing is to remove the gfdl'd texi files from the sources, > so that the package still builds. The idea is to replace these files > with dummy content, such that the build still succeds and the Makefile > don't have to be patched.
Unless I am mistaken, there was a Debian General Resolution lately that allows GFDL'd documents in main, provided they have no front-cover text, no back-cover text and no invariants. I am concerned that wholesale deletion of all documentation from the GCC package is a disservice to users. Should we not rather assess each document individually and remove only those that fail the General Resolution criteria? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
