Hi Adrian, On 09-01-2021 21:37, Adrian Bunk wrote: > you are saying the version in unstable passes all tests for migration, > and needs only this bug closed?
Yes. Otherwise the excuses would have mentioned the issues. Looking at
the excuses_yaml I see this:
- 'Migration status for bagel (- to 1.2.2-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration
policy/introduces a regression'
- 'Issues preventing migration:'
- 'Updating bagel introduces new bugs: <a
href="https://bugs.debian.org/952463";>#952463</a>'
- 'Additional info:'
- Piuparts tested OK - <a
href="https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/b/bagel.html";>https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/b/bagel.html</a>
- Required age reduced by 3 days because of autopkgtest
- 740 days old (needed 2 days)
is-candidate: false
item-name: bagel
maintainer: Debichem Team
migration-policy-verdict: REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
new-version: 1.2.2-1
old-version: '-'
policy_info:
age:
age-requirement: 2
current-age: 740
verdict: PASS
autopkgtest:
bagel/1.2.2-1:
amd64:
- PASS
-
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/b/bagel/4806582/log.gz
- https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/bagel/testing/amd64
- null
- null
arm64:
- PASS
-
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/b/bagel/5589842/log.gz
- https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/bagel/testing/arm64
- null
- null
ppc64el:
- PASS
-
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/b/bagel/7273182/log.gz
- https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/bagel/testing/ppc64el
- null
- null
verdict: PASS
block:
verdict: PASS
build-depends:
verdict: PASS
built-using:
verdict: PASS
builtonbuildd:
signed-by:
amd64: [email protected]
arm64: [email protected]
mips64el: [email protected]
ppc64el: [email protected]
s390x: [email protected]
verdict: PASS
depends:
verdict: PASS
implicit-deps:
verdict: PASS
piuparts:
piuparts-test-url: https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/b/bagel.html
test-results: pass
verdict: PASS
rc-bugs:
shared-bugs: []
unique-source-bugs:
- '952463'
unique-target-bugs: []
verdict: REJECTED_PERMANENTLY
reason: []
source: bagel
So it's only held back because of the bug.
> At least I am not seeing any problem that has been observed during the
> past 8 months that needs action.
Paul
PS: I did have a hint in place, but that was only to ignore failures on
arm64. I've removed that just now.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
