On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:01:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:57:57PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > idle-python2.3 depends on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3), which is impossible > > to satisfy because the latest nonvirtual version of python2.3-tk was > > 2.3.5-9.1 and dpkg does not (yet?) support versioned dependencies on > > virtual packages. As such, could you please either drop the version > > specification or depend on python-tk (>= 2.4.3)?
> Depending on python-tk (>= 2.4.3) is incorrect, because future versions of > python-tk are not guaranteed to implement python2.3-tk at all. I'm pretty > sure Matthias knows this, though -- just mentioning for the bug log. :) > Since I assume the python2.3-tk 2.3.5-3sarge1 in sarge does *not* satisfy > idle-python2.3's needs, the most correct dependency seems to be: > Depends: python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3) | python-tk (>= 2.4.3), python2.3-tk > There are three ways this dependency would be satisfied -- a real > python2.3-tk package with a version >= 2.4.3, a python-tk package >= 2.4.3 > that provides python2.3-tk, or a python-tk package which doesn't provide > python2.3-tk plus a python2.3-tk package < 2.4.3 which is co-installable > with python-tk. The last of these is obviously incorrect, but I don't see > any fix for that which isn't worse (except implementing versioned > Provides...). AJ points out that the obvious fix is to have idle-python2.3 also Conflict: python2.3-tk (<< 2.4.3). Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
