Hi Stephen,

Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,

You're writing to yourself as "Dear Maintainer"? :-)

> Version 0.3 of infnoise busy-waits; 0.2.6 didn’t, so this is a
> regression.

Any news on this? I just dist-upgraded a box which has a Infinite
Noise TRNG connected from Buster to Bullseye and noticed that infnoise
is gone. That way I stumbled upon this bug report.

There seems a new upstream release (0.3.1) at
https://github.com/13-37-org/infnoise/releases/tag/0.3.1 (but no
changelog entry for it so far) and 57 more commits to master since
then:

https://github.com/13-37-org/infnoise/compare/0.3.1...master

Not sure if any of these fix this issue.

> I’m designating this as serious to prevent 0.3 from migrating to
> testing.

That's nice, but any chance to get infnoise back into testing?

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Reply via email to