Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:02:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343599: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghemical
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:06:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:53:19PM +0100, Gregoire Masliah wrote:
> > > the version of ghemical i've attempted to install is 1.01-2
> >
> > I have requested a rebuild for the amd64 archive which should make
> > ghemical installable on stable/amd64 again.
>
> Hello Michael,
> what is the status of this bug ?
> It seems it should be tagged stable or closed, but it does not affect
> etch.
Right, doing so now.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--- End Message ---
