Quoting Xavier (2020-05-25 15:31:54) > Le 25/05/2020 à 15:08, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Quoting Xavier (2020-05-25 14:53:50) > >> Le 25/05/2020 à 14:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >>> node-vows is not really maintained in Debian, and largely > >>> unmaintained upstream. > >>> > >>> Either someone in the JavaScript team take over from me in looking > >>> after it, or it should be dropped from Debian. > >>> > >>> As is, I I consider it unsuitable for inclusion in a stable release > >>> of Debian. > > > >> dak result: > >> > >> Checking reverse dependencies... > >> # Broken Build-Depends: > >> d3: node-vows > >> ltx: node-vows > >> node-async-stacktrace: node-vows > >> node-clean-css: node-vows > >> node-databank: node-vows > >> node-errs: node-vows > >> node-expat: node-vows (>= 0.8.1) > >> node-lcov-parse: node-vows > >> node-tough-cookie: node-vows > >> queue-async: node-vows > >> science.js: node-vows > >> smash: node-vows (>= 0.7) > >> > >> Dependency problem found. > > > > Yes. It is my understanding that simply filing an RC bugreport and > > waiting long enough, those dependencies should automatically get > > notified that this package is no longer suitable for testing. > > > > > >> Two options: > >> * update vows to last published version (0.8.3, 11 months ago) > >> * remove/change test of the listed packages > > > > Feel fee to volunteer keeping it alive, just make sure to remove me as > > uploader. > > Proposition: > * /me updates vows and closes the relevant bug > * eyes.js bug stays opened > * /me opens a bug against vows (upstream) to remove this dependency > (that looks really unmaintained)
Fine by me, as long as you remove me as uploader. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
