Hi Lev, Lev Lamberov <dogs...@debian.org> writes:
> Hi Nicholas and David, > > Пн 24 фев 2020 @ 12:27 Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com>: > >> Lev Lamberov <dogs...@debian.org> writes: >> >>> Hmmm, looks like the bug is caused by undo-tree, since when >>> elpa-undo-tree 0.6.4-3 is installed tests are passed correctly. >>> Moreover, when new upstream version of undo-tree is used (0.7.4, not >>> currently in Debian) tests also are passed correctly. >> >> Lev, thank you for working to find, and finding the cause! Sorry, I >> share the blame for this regression because I sponsored the upload of >> 0.7.1. How urgently would you like a fix? I'd like to give David some >> time to prepare the new undo-tree release, but can prepare it myself if >> too much time passes. BTW, are undo-trees tests flaky or could you >> enable autopkgtests for it at this time? > > In fact, this was not that urgent. Anyway, thank you both for your work > and kindness! There's no one to blame simply because it is up to > impossible to check a package against all possible regressions > (especially given that dependency chain becomes way too long pretty > quickly). > Thank you Lev, that's kind :-) On the upside, autopkgtests give us an edge over MELPA Stable! Sorry for not noticing emacs-bind-map already had them enabled. IIRC the dep chain for this package is now covered, so our early-warning system should be functional. 'wish we had untruncated backtraces... > Thanks again! I'm closing this bug (it also motivated me to update > packaging of emacs-bind-map, which should have been done at some point). > Wonderful! By the way, whenever I see a lot of packaging updates on our mailing list it also motivates me to work on my packages :-D Take care, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
