Control: reassign -1 src:ns3 3.30+dfsg-3.1

On Ma, 11 feb 20, 11:46:29, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Source: src:ns3
> Version: 3.30+dfsg-3.1
> Severity: serious
> Tag: ftbfs
> Tag: help
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm the maintainer of this package. I'm opening this bug to discuss the issue
> with whom may be interested, and keep track of the discussion.
> 
> The package is currently trying to enter testing to fix 2 (easy) RC bugs, but
> fails to do so because builds fail on mipsel with the following message:
> 
> ------------------------------
> as: out of memory allocating 17107680 bytes after a total of 567459840 bytes
> /tmp/cc23jwIU.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/cc23jwIU.s: Fatal error: can't close /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ns-3.30/build-
> shared/src/lte/bindings/ns3module.cc.7.o: memory exhausted
> ------------------------------
> 
> I tried to reduce the memory consumption with the following chunks in
> debian/rules:
> 
> ------------------------------
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU),mipsel)
>   # Drop the debug symbols all together on mipsel to avoid OOM causing FTBFS
>   export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP=-g
>   export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP=-g
> endif
> LDFLAGS+=-Wl,--as-needed
> 
> # Define CFLAGS and friends to harden the build -- must come any addition to
> these variables
> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
> include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
> 
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU),mipsel)
>   # Further reduce the memory consumption on mipsel
>   LDFLAGS += -Wl,--reduce-memory-overheads -Wl,--no-keep-memory
> endif
> -------------------------------
> 
> The version that failed on the buildd servers does not have these changes, but
> I tested it on the porterbox. I manually inspected the command-line parameters
> passed to the parser, and it seem to be all right. Compiling without -g and
> linking with the reduce-memory-overheads (unless I'm wrong). But this is not
> sufficient: I get exactly the same error message.
> 
> In addition, I don't think that this is a real bug of as. ns-3 is a very large
> library, and upstream is not paying a lot of effort on reducing its size or
> optimizing the linking phase. I don't have any idea of how to fix it myself.
> 
> 
> I guess that I should ask for the removal of the mipsel version of this
> package, but I'm not entirely sure. I'd love to have ns-3 building on
> every platform, even if I'm certain that nobody will ever try to use
> it on this platform. This is a rather inefficient simulator used in
> science. Users will more probably deploy it to a fast compute server.
> But still, if possible, being compilable on mipsel too would be
> healthy for the software, if I could.
> 
> Any help or advice is really really welcomed. Everything is in the salsa 
> repository.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mt
> 
> -- 
> Vae Soli.



-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to