Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:37:59 -0600 with message-id <4359159.id0ST5bdiJ@riemann> and subject line Re: Bug#922574: digiKam FTBFS with OpenCV 4 has caused the Debian Bug report #922574, regarding digikam: FTBFS against opencv 4 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 922574: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=922574 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: digikam Version: 5.9.0-1 Severity: important digikam uses opencv headers that have been deprecated in opencv4
digikam_5.9.0-1_ppc64el-2019-02-15T08:21:02Z.build.zst
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 5:51:38 A.M. CST Agustin Martin wrote: > Thanks a lot for uploading digikam 6.4.0. Since this #922574 bug report was > not closed with it, I guess you want to give this upload an extended time > before testing migration. Mainly I wanted to make sure all the ports would build ... also i forgot :-) Right now there's just one build failure -- but also a patch (bug #950731) -- so I'll go ahead and close this now. > Minimally tested but it is apparently fixing #918478 too. That's good news, thanks! > Some other bug reports were filed for older digikam versions and may no > longer apply. Do you mind if I mail submitters to double check that before > closing those bug reports? I absolutely don't mind. On the contrary, I wholeheartedly welcome any help on triaging / reproducing old bugs! Best practice is to email to n...@bugs.debian.org and copy nnn-submit...@bugs.debian.org. Include any new information such as if you tried to reproduce and what the result was. Thanks, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---