Hi, On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:17:01 +0100 "Chris Lamb" <la...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi László, > > > But you mean plural packages? I knew only python-django. I meant > > sure, it's a FTBFS in experimental where […] > > I see what you mean now, thanks. I assumed it affected more packages > and was more severe than just python-django from the description, but > I admittedly had done no specific searching. > > > In short, I don't get the importance of filing a FTBFS bug for a beta > > release in experimental. > > Hah, well my defense I did not file this bug and indeed deliberately > did not file any issue in Debian for this very reason when I first > noticed it, prefering to file a bug upstream first (there have been > similar short-term issues in other database backends in the past). > > I would be perfectly happy with downgrading this to important and thus > non-RC. > > > Yeah, you are British. :) > > Don't quite follow that... :)
Can we please move this bug forward? python-django *in sid* has been failing to build from source since the beginning of November. It's FTBFS is hampering CVE fixes from reaching testing users and is hampering the python 2 removal effort. @python-django maintainers what does this mean for the functionality of python-django in bullseye? Is it "only" the test that fails and can that thus be temporarily disabled? Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
