On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 15:56 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Philipp Wollschlegel <philipp.wollschle...@adfinis-sygroup.ch> (2019-10-28): > > On 28.10.19 15:11, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:18 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > Bugreport against kernel version mismatch, when using outdated or > > > > broken > > > > netboot images: > > > > This isn't a package / message problem, this is a process problem. > > > > The netboot image is not built at the same time as the rest of the > > distribution. I.e. the kernel in the main distro changes and the netboot > > image still uses the old one. > > > > Even when using a direct url to the netboot image, the netboot image > > will fail, using the same package mirror, the netboot image came from. > > That's not true for stable or oldstable. Also, we ship netboot images in > packages, use that and be happy? > > If users are tracking testing or unstable, well, yes; those > distributions are WIP.
I think that's reasonable for unstable, but this really shouldn't happen in testing (and I didn't realise it did). Ben. > But the script you quoted seems to be about buster, so using d-i-n-i > packages should be a no-brainer. > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/debian-installer-netboot-images > > > Cheers, -- Ben Hutchings Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
