On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:39 AM Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:09:36PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: > > Source: scim > > > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4 > > as [announced] in: > > > > [announced] < > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00006.html> > > > > Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems > > maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case. > > > > [OpenSSL 1.1 support] < > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828522> > > > > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly > depending on > > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get > > removed from the Debian repositories. > > > > Therefore, please take the time and: > > - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 > > port of your application > > - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether > there are > > suitable alternatives for your users > > - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it > > - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian > > archives, consider removing the Qt4 version > > Given upstream's comments on https://github.com/scim-im/scim/issues/21, > let's > move forward by dropping the scim-qt-immodule binary package? It can still > be re-added if a Qt5 port appears at a later time. > Sure. I have made the update and been waiting for maintainer's review. https://github.com/leggewie-DM/scim/pull/1 Thanks, Tz-Huan
