Am 30.08.19 um 11:04 schrieb Simon McVittie: > Control: tags -1 + bullseye sid > > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 10:04:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Setting up fuse (2.9.9-1) ... >> dpkg: error processing package fuse (--configure): >> installed fuse package post-installation script subprocess returned error >> exit status 1 > ... >> # udevadm test --action -p /devices/virtual/misc/fuse >> Invalid action '-p' > > Similar to the equivalent fuse3 bug #934293, this seems to be a regression > since buster: the same binary package installs OK on buster. Maybe > udevadm became more strict about its parameter parsing?
I'm currently investigating, whether this is a regression in udevadm or not That said: > Similar to fuse3, it would be helpful if the maintainer script had less > "> /dev/null 2>&1" so that error messages would appear. > >> I'm not exactly sure what this code is supposed to achieve. >> Since fuse no longer ships its own udev rules, maybe it can be dropped >> altogether? > > Or if the postinst is still necessary, maybe fuse3 could take over the > fuse binary package name for bullseye (with a transitional package) so that > bugs like this one don't need to be fixed in both places? That unhelpful redirection aside, that maintainer scripts code (in fuse/fuse3) looks fishy and should be carefully reviewed if it is actually still needed and if so, add a comment or two. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
