Hi doko, On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> I disagree. I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not >> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update. Then >> people can start testing if the wrapper works. > > Well, I'm afraid that what will happen is that the people who will > test will simply find out that it just works for them (just like it > does already for them with openjdk-8) ; will we then conclude near the > release that it should be enabled by default for Buster, and then be hit > by the much wider exposition to jaw? > > If on the contrary we enable it by default during the freeze, we will > have *way* more testing coverage, and thus be much more confident with > keeping it enabled by default in Buster if we don't see bug reports.
Although I agree with Samuel here, can we please-pretty-please get an upload even if you don't enable it, such that we can get this story into buster? Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
