Hi Santiago, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:31:34AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > make[6]: *** [Makefile:412: download_progress.o] Error 1 > > > > Will test later (once the dist-upgrade is through) with 8.3.0-5 from > > unstable, too. > > Note: The rebuilds I triggered on reproducible-builds worked ok,
Yes, and it compiled fine again after I upgraded g++-8 and gcc-8 to 8.3.0-5. I suspect this is a case of of https://bugs.debian.org/926234, which was introduced in 8.3.0-2, boost-related (aptitude uses boost) and was fixed in 8.3.0-5 which is not yet in buster. I'll build it a few more times with 8.3.0-5 to make sure it's not non-deterministic, but I'm optimistic, that this is a duplicate of #926234 in g++-8 8.3.0-2 to 8.3.0-4. > but not the one on the armhf architecture in unstable: > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/aptitude.html At least this morning 6:02 UTC, g++-8 8.3.0-5 was not yet available on armhf Raspberry Pi running Debian Sid. And according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-8 the armhf build only finished ("installed") around 6:54 UTC, so it very likely wasn't yet available to a build having started at 06:54:26 UTC this morning. I currently don't have my SSO client certificate handy. Can you schedule another reproducible builds rebuild on armhf? At least on my Sid Raspberry Pi, 8.3.0-5 is now available on armhf, too. > (Not sure how to interpret that. Maybe it's a compiler bug after all). If the armhf builds are fixed the next rebuild, too, I'm very confident, that it is. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
