On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 07:12:43PM +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Good. Try this version of patch, please. It seems to works for me in my > i386 chroot.
Works for me too, and light testing didn't reveal any problems. > > It would make sense to limit this to 32-bit architectures as I believe the > > 64-bit architectures always have LFS support no matter the build flags. > > I'd leave it as-is. Yes, it may be redundant on 64 bit platforms, but it > will go away rather soon anyway. I'd rather not complicate `debian/rules'. Whatever, just seems strange to me to ship a -nolfs binary that's actually LFS enabled just like the normal one. > > Shipping these -nolfs binaries and including instructions for upgrading > > databases in the Buster release notes would be an acceptable fix for > > this issue IMO. > By the way, should I file bug aganist release.debian.org now, or when we > are settled on solution? I'm fine with either, and I think we're pretty much settled now :) Thanks for your work, -- Niko
