Hi David,
On 2019-02-04 22:01, David Lamparter wrote:
> I've added Conflicts: lines, as that seemed to be the most conservative
> option to me. ("Replaces: quagga" is a 'layer 9' discussion that I
> think it's a bit early to have at this point.)
>
> If you have any comments/opinions/input, I'd appreciate that.
Looks good to me. You can reconsider the Breaks+Replaces once you
implement whatever conclusion such a 'layer 9' discussion has reached.
I'll come back to you in case you missed to Conflicts: some package :-)
Andreas
