Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:15:49 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line fixed in 1:7.6.4-0.4 as well
has caused the Debian Bug report #887315,
regarding libgc FTBFS on armel: missing symbol AO_locks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
887315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887315
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libgc
Version: 1:7.4.2-8.1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgc&arch=armel&ver=1%3A7.4.2-8.1&stamp=1515764936&raw=0
...
dh_makeshlibs -a
dh_makeshlibs: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols
file: see diff output below
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: no debian/symbols file used as basis for generating
debian/libgc1c2/DEBIAN/symbols
--- new_symbol_file (libgc1c2_1:7.4.2-8.1_armel)
+++ dpkg-gensymbolsCP1Zv9 2018-01-12 13:48:50.806274887 +0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
libgc.so.1 libgc1c2 #MINVER#
(arch=armel)AO_compare_double_and_swap_double_emulation@Base 1:7.4.2
(arch=armel)AO_fetch_compare_and_swap_emulation@Base 1:7.4.2
- (arch=armel)AO_locks@Base 1:7.4.2
+#MISSING: 1:7.4.2-8.1# (arch=armel)AO_locks@Base 1:7.4.2
(arch=armel)AO_pause@Base 1:7.4.2
(arch=armel)AO_pt_lock@Base 1:7.4.2
(arch=armel)AO_store_full_emulation@Base 1:7.4.2
dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors
debian/rules:11: recipe for target 'binary-arch' failed
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
This might be caused by the recent armv4t -> armv5te armel
baseline change.
I am completely lost regarding what is going on here,
starting with the fact that this looks a Libatomic-ops symbol?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:7.6.4-0.4
fixed in 1:7.6.4-0.4 as well
--- End Message ---
