On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53:05PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Most likely you meant to break timidity-daemon (<= 2.14.0-1~) rather
> > than (>= 2.14.0-1~).
> 
> I'm not sure that'd be correct either. From the bug that this was
> supposed to fix (because the changelog description is not clear on
> what was broken and what was the fix), this seems to be a new behavior
> from timidity-daemon starting in that version, which does not play nice
> when pulseaudio is also in the system, and both fight for exclusive
> access to the sound devices.
> 
> But this seems to be both a (perhaps temporary) workaround (why not
> instead try to diagnose why timidity-daemon now requires exclusive
> access to the sound devices?), and in the wrong place (if the problem
> is with pulseaudio, then either of the packages need to possibly Break
> the other, but not between timidity and timidity-daemon, I for one do
> not have pulseaudio on this particular system for example).

I also don't think that a Break is required here at all.
If it needs to start after pulseaudio because otherwise the sound device
is blocked, maybe the Required-Start field in the init script needs to
be changed (to $all).
(Maybe that was a regression from the last upgrade that the init script
is started earlier.)

Regards,
  Reiner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to