This one time, at band camp, Wilmer van der Gaast said: > Hello, > > I noticed this bug is keeping 1.0.x from entering testing. :-( > > So which part of the policy is violated by this behaviour? "Don't > touch, maintainer scripts will do it" files aren't that rare in /etc, > and it shouldn't be hard to run dpkg-reconfigure once to set the new > port number. > > If this isn't really a policy violation, I'd rather reduce the bug > severity a bit and fix this in 1.1 packages.
Section 10.7.3, it looks like. You can refresh your memory here: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3 At first glance, it looks like the maintainer scripts are probably not calling update-inetd correctly, or update-inetd is doing something bizarre and non-idempotent. Take care, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
