On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:07:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I assume you're referring to observer.h etc.? > > This actually indicates a nasty licensing mistake upstream.
I don't have any reason to believe that there is a problem here. observer.texi does not have an explicit license, GFDL or otherwise. The intent to use it under both is quite clear. It's just a complication for the build process. > Barring that, you'll have to write a replacement for observer.h, and > you'll have to write it without referring to the manual. Have fun. :-P I can write it off the top of my head and with my eyes closed, but I am not about to do that, unless the ridiculous pedantry of debian-legal forces me to. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
