Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:52:58 +0200 with message-id <20180305155258.GA21226@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#892078: rakarrack: Forgotten build-dep: Needs dpatch has caused the Debian Bug report #892078, regarding rakarrack: Forgotten build-dep: Needs dpatch to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 892078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892078 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: rakarrack Version: 0.6.1-4+b2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, tl;dr: Add 'dpatch' to Build-Depends or similar. History: I wanted to rebuild rakarrack from source in order to debug a problem (#892077). I guess that once upon a time, having cdbs implied that dpatch is available, too. This is not true anymore. Reproducible steps: - New system, have build-essential, devscripts, and many others available. - Download dependencies: `sudo apt-get build-dep rakarrack` - Download sources: `apt-get source rakarrack` (in fact I cloned the git repo) - Build binary: `fakeroot ./debian/rules binary` Expected behavior: Creates binary Actual behavior: Fails with `make: dpatch: Command not found`. Cheers, Ben Wiederhake -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing-debug APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages rakarrack depends on: ii jackd 5 ii libasound2 1.1.3-5 ii libc6 2.26-6 ii libfltk1.1 1.1.10-23 ii libfontconfig1 2.12.6-0.1 ii libfreetype6 2.8.1-2 ii libgcc1 1:8-20180218-1 ii libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.125] 1.9.12~dfsg-2 ii libsamplerate0 0.1.9-1 ii libsndfile1 1.0.28-4 ii libstdc++6 8-20180218-1 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.4-3 ii libxft2 2.3.2-1+b2 ii libxpm4 1:3.5.12-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 rakarrack recommends no packages. rakarrack suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:12:26AM +0100, Ben Wiederhake wrote: > Package: rakarrack > Version: 0.6.1-4+b2 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) >... > - Download sources: `apt-get source rakarrack` (in fact I cloned the git repo) >... The latter part is what causes your problem: The latest version in the git repo is 0.6.1-1. The proper way to get the sources for what is in the archive is "apt-get source", git repositories might or might not match the contents that is there (e.g. in the case of non-maintainer uploads it is often not even possible that the non-maintainer pushes the changes to the git repo of the maintainer). cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--- End Message ---
