Hi again, On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:16:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > So, despite Julien's valid objection that core library conflicts cause > dist-upgrades to be more brittle, I think the right answer here is:
> - keep all sonames as-is. > - rename libcurl3 to libcurl4. > - leave the package names of the other variants as-is. > - *if* libcurl-gnutls.so.4 and libcurl-nss.so.4 sonames are known to exist > elsewhere outside the Debian ecosystem, fix the symbol versions for > libcurl3-gnutls and libcurl3-nss to use symbol aliases, so that CURL_FOO_4 > is used as the preferred name and CURL_FOO_3 is for compatibility only. > (This is only worth doing if this increases binary compatibility; > otherwise it's better to maintain bidirectional binary compatibility for > Debian-built binaries.) > - change the symbol versions for libcurl4 to CURL_OPENSSL_4. > I would be willing to prepare a patch that implements this. I've done this now and raised an MP: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/curl/merge_requests/3 (I'm assuming there is no point in CURL_FOO_4 symbol version for libcurl-gnutls and libcurl-nss, because these sonames come from a Debian-specific patch and therefore there's no upstream binary compatibility to be concerned about.) Thoughts on this? In terms of ABI changes, this appears to be a strict subset of what Alessandro had proposed and would be binary-compatible for libcurl.so.4; so at minimum, we will probably adopt this change in Ubuntu and proceed with the transition ASAP there, even if Debian later decides to change the ABI for gnutls and nss variants also. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
