Hrm.… > Sure, it’s attached, and it seems really weird…
… I had thought someone had defined NULL as just 0 (although dalias makes a good argument for it) and it was passed as a too-short sentinel, but it uses execve, so that was not it. But I see a lot of seccomp stuff in there, which, obviously, is not there when I just run it from the shell. Syscall numbers on x32 differ, so perhaps, that is already the culprit? bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"
