On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 00:27:57 +0100 Antonio Ospite <a...@ao2.it> wrote:
> Hi, > > I had to fix the "logs.db" database to be able to have the history > working with gajim 0.16.11 so I am pasting some info below in case > someone else needs it. > When I wrote 0.16.11 I actually meant 0.16.11.git20171214-1 from Debian experimental. [...] > See the attached script, you might have to slightly change it to make > it work according to what previous version of gajim you were using > before, I had 0.16.8-5 but I am not sure if the misspelled > "additinal_data" column was there from some version from git I might > have run at some point. > The misspelled 'additinal_data' column was introduced here https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/blob/gajim-1.0.0-alpha1/gajim/common/optparser.py#L866 when updating from a previous version. However the code, and newly created tables, actually use 'additional_data'. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
