On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:44:32AM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:03:50PM -0600, Geiger Guenter wrote:

> > Thanks for all the work you are putting into the package. I know its in 
> > a terrible state, Actually what should be done is to repackage it instead
> > of trying to fix the old packaging. Anyhow, I am thankful for every kind of
> > help with it. Should I apply your patches and reupload or are you going
> > to do an NMU ?

> I should have changed the subject, Amaya was the person that did the
> original IT-NMU, and I kept the "Re: Bug#346695: Intend to NMU ivtools"
> intact, without making clear that I was just adding additional info for her
> or for whoever wanted to upload the package, not meaning that I intended
> to NMU the package. ivtools is largely beyond my skills (My C++ skills
> are null) and, while my changes are only related to packaging, I prefer if
> such an NMU (or normal upload) is carried out by somebody knowing better
> the package.

Of course if you are too busy now, mostly agree with the diff
and prefer me to do an NMU, just let me know.

Cheers,

-- 
Agustin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to