Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream ----- Forwarded message from Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> -----
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:49:31 +0200 From: Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> To: John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> Cc: gnucash-devel <gnucash-de...@gnucash.org>, Micha Lenk <mi...@lenk.info> Subject: Re: Bug#876306: gnucash FTBFS: object class 'Transaction' has no property named 'bogus' Ok then, fix committed: https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/42ac55e03a1a84739f4a5b7a247c31d91c0adc4a So this will be fixed in the next stable release. Thanks for pointing this out! Geert On donderdag 5 oktober 2017 03:23:00 CEST John Ralls wrote: > No, no use case in mind. I think I wrote those tests in a somewhat robotic > mode, trying to ensure complete test coverage for eventual refactoring of > the GObject code in the various engine modules. We’ve since decided to drop > GObject altogether and rewrite the classes in C++, so even if there was a > reason to test GObject behavior there won’t be one for long. > > By all means delete the test. > > Regards, > John Ralls > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 1:47 PM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I tend to agree with you and I have a patch waiting to be committed to > > solve this. Before I commit it though I would like to hear from John if > > he had a particular use case in mind when he chose to add this test. > > > > Geert > > > > On woensdag 27 september 2017 09:44:29 CEST Micha Lenk wrote: > >> Dear Gnucash developers, > >> > >> The following bug has been reported in the Debian bug tracker as > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876306 > >> > >> I agree that Gnucash tests shouldn't test the behavior of GObject. > >> Please consider to drop this test. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Micha > >> ----- End forwarded message -----
