Not a DD, sadly (yet!) sent from my phone, please excuse brevity
On 21 Apr 2017 19:36, "Michael Stapelberg" <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < > michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On 19 April 2017 at 20:55, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote: >> >>> On 19/04/17 at 09:05 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >>> > This is the third time an FTBFS report against this package (which was >>> > removed from Debian) was submitted. >>> > >>> > The other two times were >>> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855926 and >>> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848806, both were >>> closed >>> > asking for an explanation as to why the issue was filed in the first >>> place. >>> >>> ... And none sending the question to the bug submitter. >> >> >> Defeated by the Debian BTS, I didn't realize that you had to email the >> submitter separately when closing a bug... >> >> >>> >>> > lucas, is this a bug in your rebuild infrastructure, or did something >>> go >>> > wrong with the removal? >>> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839364 (same issue >>> as the >>> > one you’re reporting) was closed by ftpmaster due to package removal. >>> >>> In my local Sources file, I have: >> >> >> [...] >> >> >>> 'Extra-Source-Only' means that there are still binary packages in the >>> archive >>> that were built using that version of the golang package. >>> >>> In fact, for that version: >>> $ grep -e Package -e Using 127.0.0.1\:9999_debian_dists_t >>> esting_main_binary-amd64_Packages |grep -B1 'golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)' >>> Package: golang-github-armon-go-metrics-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2), golang-github-datadog-datadog-go (= >>> 0.0~git20150930.0.b050cd8-1), golang-github-prometheus-common (= >>> 0+git20160321.4045694-1), golang-goprotobuf (= 0.0~git20160330-1), >>> golang-procfs (= 0+git20150616.c91d8ee-1), golang-prometheus-client (= >>> 0.7.0+ds-3), golang-protobuf-extensions (= 0+git20150513.fc2b8d3-4) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-hashicorp-go-msgpack-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-stretchr-objx-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> -- >>> Package: golang-github-kr-pty-dev >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2) >>> >>> This case could be ignored by the rebuild scripts, or binnmus could be >>> trigerred to get rid of the other versions. I'm not sure it makes sense >>> to ship >>> that many copies of golang in stretch. >>> >>> I think I read something about an organized plan to get rid of such extra >>> packages using binnmus, but maybe I was dreaming. Ccing debian-release@. >>> >> >> I think I heard something about that. FWIW, though, these Built-Using >> fields are bogus, golang -dev packages just ship source and so do not >> actually contain anything built by the mentioned version of the compiler. I >> think I've managed to hammer this into everyone's heads now but I guess >> there are plenty of packages in the archive that haven't had an upload >> since then (so I guess the binNMUs could just drop the field?). >> > > Updating or dropping the field seems fine with me. Could you do these 4 > binNMUs so that we can close out this bug please? :) > > -- > Best regards, > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-golang-devel mailing list > pkg-golang-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-golang-devel >
