And also #831442, which has a workaround that can be applied to tachyon.
Best,
Tobias
On 12/15/2016 05:03 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes, this looks like #842881.
>
> Note by the way that libtachyon-mpich-0 already depends on libmpich12 on
> hurd-i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, ppc64 and sh4.
>
> Best,
> Tobias
>
> On 12/15/2016 04:56 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I can reproduce the issue in schroot Sid environment on an amd64 box.
>> The Depends fields for the libraries is
>>
>> ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
>>
>> and it works fine except for mpich. Before to add it by hand, I want
>> to understand why dpkg-shlibdep does not make properly its job.
>>
>> $ dpkg-shlibdeps
>> debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0
>>
>> gives something interesting:
>>
>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 has an unexpected SONAME
>> (libmpi.so.20)
>> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for
>> /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 (used by
>> debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0)
>>
>> And, more interestingly,
>>
>> ls -l /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12
>>
>> gives
>>
>> /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 -> libmpi.so
>>
>> libmpi.so coming from libopenmpi-dev while
>>
>>
>> Installing only libmpich-dev on a fresh schroot gives similar output:
>> it looks as a mpich building error.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jerome
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
>> debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath
>
