Control: severity -1 important Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:02:07PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:21:34AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Do we have a timeline for OpenSSL 1.1? > > It currently seems to be when we can get the number of packages > that FTBFS to a reasonable number. Clearly it won't be viable to update Ruby 2.3 to OpenSSL 1.1, so I have uploaded a fixed package that builds against OpenSSL 1.0. Instead of closing this bug, I will leave it open so that when Ruby 2.4 comes we don't forget to make it build against OpenSSL 1.1. Let me know if that is confusing for you when keeping track of the transition; I can always close this one and do something else to record this need for Ruby 2.4.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
