2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>:
> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]>: > >> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal > >> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't > >> migrate to testing because the lack of armel binaries breaks a number > >> of packages that depend on nodejs on armel: > >> > >> trying: nodejs > >> skipped: nodejs (15, 0, 81) > >> got: 68+546: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-11:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1:m-546 > >> * armel: node-almond, node-groove, node-iconv, node-leveldown, > >> node-node-expat, node-sqlite3, node-topcube, node-websocket, node-ws, > >> node-xmlhttprequest, qtwebchannel5-examples > >> > >> Those need to get their armel binaries removed as well. > >> > > > > Thank you for your help, at some point i believed the request for removal > > implied removal of dependencies as well. > > Should i make another removal request ? Would you like to do it ? I'm > > super-busy right now. > > I've filed the RM bugs for the affected packages, some more may be > required for their reverse dependencies. > > Thank you. Can we close this bug now ? Jérémy
