On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:40:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 20:37 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > Can anyone please help me understand about why libgnupg-interface-perl > > is not migrating to testing? > The log - https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt - should > be your next port of call. That gives us:
Oh, wow, that was not on my radar. > Examining the changes in the new version of libgnupg-interface-perl and > the dependencies of the affected packages shows that > libgnupg-interface-perl now depends on "gnupg1". libmail-gnupg-perl, > meanwhile, depends on "gnupg". > > "gnupg1" declares a conflict on "gnupg (< 1.4.20-6+exp1)" and: > > gnupg | 1.4.20-6 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, > armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x D'oh. And gnupg 2.x doesn't migrate because of #836259. And libgnupg-interface-perl is about to be removed from testing because of #834281 -- but, I think, this bug doesn't affect testing since there's gnupg 1.4.x. So removing the stretch tag might already help? Or at least cc'ing the bug to reset the autoremoval counter :) > Therefore unstable's libgnupg-interface-perl and testing's > libmail-gnupg-perl are not co-installable, but the latter depends on the > former. Thanks for this analysis! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: The Dubliners: Spanish Lady
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
