Hi,
I'm not a staden user - just packaging it. Could somebody please
comment on the considerations below?
Thanks
Andreas.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 04:47:56PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not familiar with staden, but am taking a look at it and see that
> /usr/bin/spin is symlinked -> /usr/bin/gap4, and that is essentially a
> wrapper script that run things from /usr/lib/staden/bin/ (or BINDIR).
>
> I also noticed that invoking "staden" returns a list of those file in
> the BINDIR, so invoking "staden spin" would still work without a
> /usr/bin/spin file shipped with the staden package. Of course, there's
> still the question of the manpage.
>
> For the "spin" binary in the "spin" package, there isn't such a
> mechanism available, so it would be more of a "think of a suitable name
> and update the Debian documentation and README appropriately" exercise.
>
> I assume "spin" has been called "spin" since its inception in staden
> [1], and it's the same for the spin package [2]. Both projects appear
> active and viable, so I see this as a question of trying to make a
> sensible choice for our users (which I see as the choice that causes the
> least confusion and disruption). However, I don't pretend to know what
> that is, I'm just hoping to start the conversation around this bug. It
> seems like the packages aren't likely to be co-installed, but my
> understanding is that policy frowns upon simply having them conflict
> with each other.
>
> Is there any chance the staden maintainers would consider renaming the
> wrapper in /usr/bin to "spin-gui" or something similar? Or perhaps spin
> (software verification) might become spin-verify?
>
> Thank you,
> tony
>
> [1] http://staden.sourceforge.net/
> [2] http://spinroot.com/spin/whatispin.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
--
http://fam-tille.de
