On 03.06.2016 19:44, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > * Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]> [2016-05-31 10:45]: > >> Le mardi 31 mai 2016 à 10:34 +0200, Oliver Heimlich a écrit : >>> On 31.05.2016 10:11, Chris Lamb wrote: >>>> Source: octave-interval >>>> Version: 1.4.1-1 >>>> Severity: serious >>>> Justification: fails to build from source >>>> User: [email protected] >>>> Usertags: ftbfs >>>> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Dear Maintainer, >>>> >>>> octave-interval fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: >>> >>> This is caused by the new version of octave-pkg-dev in unstable and >>> gets fixed by Rafael's last commit >>> (58eb05c71b08bd57b5141ab49574745d0577d323). >>> >>> How urgent is it to upload a new version of octave-interval to >>> unstable? Version 1.5.0 is already on its way, but I would like to >>> wait until the release is approved upstream. >> >> It's a bug of severity serious, so I'd say it's rather urgent. And the >> fix is trivial. But of course it can wait a few days. >> >> So it's up to you to decide whether uploading 1.4.1-2 or 1.5.0-1. > > This is partly my fault. I should have coordinated the releases of > octave-pkg-dev 1.4.0 and octave-interval 1.4.1-2. At any rate, I think > this problem will be fixed soon.
Version 1.5.0 has been released upstream and is ready to be released to unstable: revision 3dd70567eb31929632b976f119d72212428cbf66 Oliver
