On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps > > -l option because it doesn't honor LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Can someone > > tell me a package which really needs this option? The ones that > > I tested so far seem to build equally fine without it... > > This option wasneeded when package builds a binary that uses libraries > built from the same source package. In this case, libraries may not be > available outside of package build directory; so ldd called from > dpkg-shlibdeps won't find them witout LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > Don't yet know how this situation is handled in your patched > dpkg-shlibdeps...
Hmm, but dpkg-shlibdeps already tries to take care of this by using all local shlibs files. Can someone point me to a package that really misbuilds without -l ? This would really help me to understand the real problem. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
