Your message dated Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:23:50 -0800
with message-id <87wpppa56h....@hope.eyrie.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#815765: remctl: FTBFS against ruby2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #815765,
regarding remctl: FTBFS against ruby2.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
815765: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: remctl
Version: 3.10-1
Severity: important
During a rebuild with ruby2.3 enabled, remctl fails to build. Please make
sure it builds against ruby2.3, which will be the Ruby version in stretch.
The full build log can be found at
https://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rebuilds/ruby2.3-build-logs/remctl_3.10-1_amd64.txt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
terce...@debian.org writes:
> During a rebuild with ruby2.3 enabled, remctl fails to build. Please make
> sure it builds against ruby2.3, which will be the Ruby version in stretch.
> The full build log can be found at
> https://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rebuilds/ruby2.3-build-logs/remctl_3.10-1_amd64.txt
Hi all,
Looks like this was a bug in PHP that was fixed in 5.6.18+dfsg-1:
* Add support for libtool >= 2.4.6 ltmain.sh location
I just did a build against unstable with Ruby 2.3 and the package built
fine and includes the Ruby 2.3 modules. I think you can just have the
release team schedule a binNMU.
Let me know, though, if my analysis is not correct.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---
