On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:46:22PM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Adam D. Barratt said: > > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:39 +0000, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > This one time, at band camp, aurelien said: > > > > the /etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam, used in the postinst script, is > > > > missing. It prevents package installation.
> > > $ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/clamav-freshclam_0.88-2_i386.deb | grep
> > > init
> > > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-01-10 03:21:06 ./etc/init.d/
> > > -rwxr-xr-x root/root 5469 2006-01-10 03:20:39
> > > ./etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam
> > > But I see that in the ones built by buildds, it is missing. Did
> > > dh_installinit suddenly become a no-op, and no one told me?
> > > I have made almost no packaging changes since 0.87.1, and none that
> > > affect either debian/rules or how the init script gets built. On
> > > 0.87.1, all the buildds managed to install an init script. Now,
> > > apparently none have.
> > > WTF is going on?
> > I suspect you're being bitten by #347577, which debhelper suffered from
> > for three days early last week. Unfortunately clamav was built the day
> > before joeyh uploaded the fixed version (5.0.15).
> Yes, that is certainly it. Now, should I ask for a binNMU, or reupload?
> I suspect clamav is not binNMU safe (it uses = ${SourceVersion} in a few
> places, so probably a reupload is better.
Yeah, not binNMU safe; you'll have to do a sourceful upload.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
