On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:09:35AM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > This bug was not RC at the first time you marked it as such. It was not > RC at the time I downgraded it back to non-RC. You were even > specifically told *not* to mark bugs prematurely as RC in 746741 with > regards to the removal of python-support. You still went ahead and did > it nonetheless only about 24 hours later :-(.
less than 24 hours later of that emails more than half of the packages were already fixed, and I was in contact with members of the ftp team and release team via IRC anyway. As I said, 'serious' is the severity you use when you're near the end of transition, not necessarily when stuff is already screwd up. > You are right that this > bug is RC now. FYI: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-python-support-rm.html > > I do not plan to introduce 0.6.9 into Debian yet, so I do not want to > accept your NMU to unstable. Feel free to redirect it to experimental. Ok, then I cancelled the deferred upload and uploaded it directly on experimental. What I cared mostly was to get the number of dependant packages low enough so ftp masters finded acceptable to break stuff. breaking 3 (= gbirthday and python-peak.{util,rules}, plus some cruft) packages for them was ok so my work is finished. You are here the only kinda of active maintainer I encountered so far, so please take care of your package. > Please be sure not to push your changes to the master branch in git, use > a separate branch instead. I won't push anything, if you want feel free to grab stuff from the uploaded package. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
