Hi, > No, it's not. Unless the new package provides the same SONAME as > libechonest2.1 > (which it does not), this is not "renaming a package". > > I was looking for some documentation, but I think the best think I can point > you > to is ยง8 of the policy. But in short: transitiong from the old SONAME to the > new > SONAME is done via rebuilds of the rev deps, not via the old library package > pulling in the new one.
Oh ok, now I understand it! Thank you for your hint! I'll fix it. Kindly regards, Stefan Ahlers
