On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:05:12PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > In your case it looks like it certainly is. Your glx alternative is
No, it is not. I never touched setup. As I wrote before more then once, the problem arises after upgrade, not as result of setup changing. > configured to Mesa instead of Nvidia: > > diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so to /usr/lib/mesa-diverted/libGL.so by > glx-diversions > diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 to /usr/lib/mesa-diverted/libGL.so.1 by > glx-diversions > diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/mesa-diverted/libGL.so.1.2 by > glx-diversions > diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2.0 to /usr/lib/mesa-diverted/libGL.so.1.2.0 > by glx-diversions You are wrong: it is about divert and not about alternative. > Please run: > > sudo update-alternatives --set glx /usr/lib/nvidia > sudo dpkg-reconfigure glx-alternative-nvidia This does not helps and can't help, because again and again: it is not setup problem, it is upgrade result. Downgrade helps. That is what I am doing to get it working: dpkg -P nvidia-kernel-support dpkg -i glx-alternative-mesa_0.5.1_amd64.deb glx-alternative-nvidia_0.5.1_amd64.deb glx-diversions_0.5.1_amd64.deb libegl1-nvidia_340.93-1_amd64.deb libgl1-nvidia-glx-i386_340.93-1_i386.deb libgl1-nvidia-glx_340.93-1_amd64.deb libgl1-nvidia-glx_340.93-1_i386.deb libgles1-nvidia_340.93-1_amd64.deb libgles2-nvidia_340.93-1_amd64.deb libnvidia-eglcore_340.93-1_amd64.deb libnvidia-ml1_340.93-1_amd64.deb nvidia-alternative_340.93-1_amd64.deb nvidia-driver-bin_340.93-1_amd64.deb nvidia-driver_340.93-1_amd64.deb nvidia-kernel-dkms_340.93-1_amd64.deb nvidia-vdpau-driver_340.93-1_amd64.deb xserver-xorg-video-nvidia_340.93-1_amd64.deb And nothing else. ### Vladimir Stavrinov ###
