On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 23:20:59 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Failing to build on a release architecture is generally an RC bug, which > > prevents testing migration. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Bas > > > > > I'm very surprised by this. The opposite was explained to me on > #debian-devel by > by Julien Cristau (cc-ing him in case he can tell me how i got this the > wrong way). > Is this written somewhere ? > Failing to build on a release architecture is not an RC bug, unless it's a regression. See section 4 of https://release.debian.org/stretch/rc_policy.txt
If there's no version of the package on ${architecture} in unstable
(either because it never built or because old builds have been removed),
then a failure to build on ${architecture} is somewhere between
wishlist and important, but it's not RC.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
