On 2015-01-15 21:32, Niko Tyni wrote: > So, even if we add the Breaks in perl-modules+perl-base, it looks like > something else is needed. AFAICS either we need to somehow ensure that > dpkg is upgraded first, or the xfonts-traditional trigger functionality > needs to handle missing modules gracefully.
Do we have a list of packages that "trigger" xfonts-traditional? Could they (or some of them or a common ancestor) depend on dpkg (>= 1.17.triggerfixed) > I'd love to hear thoughts on this. Also, my earlier questions still apply: > does this imply that all packages with strict versioned dependencies > and the like should more or less duplicate that information in Breaks > entries ? I think this list can be reduced to "Uses 'perl stuff that requires strict dependencies' in their maintainer scripts." Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
