Hi Axel,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Well, you (Andreas T) did not cite a possible relevant part here:
>
> | This was observed on the following upgrade paths:
> |
> | lenny -> squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie
Yes, I was a bit short.
> > I'm seriously wondering whether this issue is RC critical for Jessie
> > release
>
> To be honest: I think this is generally an RC-level issue and should
> be fixed.
I think any bug should be fixed (if possible) not only RC bugs. :-)
> But I also think, it's a candidate for a jessie-ignore tag as the bug
> has been in there for quite a while (obviously) and -- from a first
> glance at the log which Andreas B. attached -- has no operational
> impact, just legal impact (wrong copyright file, etc.).
+1
> One more thing I'm still curious about: How the fuck do you stumble
> upon such a bug? :-) I don't expect that Andreas runs piuparts
> starting with Lenny on a daily business or without reason. I expect
> that a real-life case (which Andreas B. didn't mention) is hidden
> behind it and caused him to do that piuparts run.
I'd also like to know this. :-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
